Skip to content
Home » How to calculate relative frequency per group with dplyr

How to calculate relative frequency per group with dplyr

One of the most frequent operations I have to do in a data wrangling process is changing my values or frequencies to shares, relative to the group they are in. In this blog post, I want to elaborate on doing this in d(t)plyr, one of the most popular packages within tidyverse.

Apparently, I was not the only one who had a counterintuitive gut-feeling when trying this particular operation. Nevertheless, the solution is pretty simple, once you know why it works.

Relative frequency of one group within total

Let’s consider getting the share of cars per cylinder in the mtcars dataset. It can easily be done as follows:

df <- as_tibble(mtcars)

df %>%
  group_by(cyl) %>%
  summarise(n_cars = n()) %>%
  mutate(share = n_cars / sum(n_cars))

Returns the following:

You will also receive a warning that goes as follows:

`summarise()` ungrouping output (override with `.groups` argument)

From the above example, it returns the share of each group within the total dataset. That makes sense, although the warning doesn’t.

Relative frequency of a group within higher-level group

The real wtf?-moment came when I found out the following generates the share of each lowest-level group within the higher-level group, instead of calculating the share of each combined group.

df %>%
  group_by(cyl, gear) %>%
  summarise(n_cars = n()) %>%
  mutate(share = n_cars / sum(n_cars))

This returns:

Shares are calculated within the higher-levels group

And once again, a warning message:

`summarise()` regrouping output by 'cyl' (override with `.groups` argument)

To find out what’s going one, we have to consult a blog post from Hadley Wickham, written last year, in the year 2020.

That’s because summarise() always peels off the last group, based on the logic that this group now occupies a single row so there’s no point grouping by it. This behaviour made perfect sense to me at the time I implemented it, but it’s been a long standing source of confusion among dplyr users (and it doesn’t make sense if your summary returns multiple rows).

Hadley Wickham, dplyr 1.0.0: last minute additions

Relative frequency of a combined group within total

If you would like to treat each line as its own group, you can use the .groups argument within the summarise function. That’s what the warning messages are trying to tell us.

df %>%
  group_by(cyl, gear) %>%
  summarise(n_cars = n(),  .groups = 'drop') %>%
  mutate(share = n_cars / sum(n_cars))

This returns:

Each row is a group, shares are calculated versus grand total

The .groups argument accepts multiple arguments:

  • drop_last: default behavior
  • drop: removes the various grouping levels
  • rowwise: every row becomes a group, the share will always be 1 if you calculate it because the nominator and denominator are on the same level.
  • keep: preserves the grouping of the input, differs from row-wise if your summary returns multiple rows

Say thanks, ask questions or give feedback

Technologies get updated, syntax changes and honestly… I make mistakes too. If something is incorrect, incomplete or doesn’t work, let me know in the comments below and help thousands of visitors.

1 thought on “How to calculate relative frequency per group with dplyr”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *